Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wenkart v Pantzer (No 2) [2010] FCA 1408 Citation: Wenkart v Pantzer (No 2) [2010] FCA 1408
Parties: THOMAS RICHARD WENKART v WARREN PANTZER AS FORMER TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS RICHARD WENKART AND HAPDAY HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 001 185 253), MACQUARIE HEALTH CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 003 531 860) AND THROVENA PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 738 763); WARREN PANTZER AS FORMER TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS RICHARD WENKART v THOMAS RICHARD WENKART AND HAPDAY HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 001 185 253)
File number: NSD 7051 of 2002
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 16 December 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – residual issues left unresolved – relief not to confer a windfall – calculation of interest for a part of a period – fixed costs order – declaratory relief
Legislation: Access to Justice (Civil Litigation Reforms) Amendment Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 37N, 51A
Cases cited: Cherry v Boultbee (1839) 4 My& Cr 442, 41 ER 171, cited Wenkart v Pantzer (No 7) [2003] FCA 1211, 132 FCR 273, cited Wenkart v Pantzer [2005] FCA 1572, 223 ALR 384, cited Pantzer v Wenkart [2006] FCAFC 140, 153 FCR 466, cited Wenkart v Pantzer [2007] FCA 1589, cited Wenkart v Pantzer [2008] FCA 478, cited Wenkart v Pantzer, in the matter of Wenkart [2008] FCA 1387, cited Wenkart v Pantzer [2009] FCA 1086, cited Wenkart v Pantzer [2010] FCA 866, 269 ALR 641, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate