Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Watts v Bendigo & Adelaide Bank Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1429 Citation: Watts v Bendigo & Adelaide Bank Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1429
Appeal from: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Watts [2010] FMCA 623
Parties: GAMBHIR WATTS and BHOJI WATTS v BENDIGO & ADELAIDE BANK LTD
File number: NSD 1126 of 2010
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – stay of all proceedings under sequestration order – whether stay should prevent recording of the fact that a sequestration order was made on the National Personal Insolvency Index
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 52(1A), 52(3) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 29 Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2005 (Cth) r 4.10Bankruptcy Regulation 1996 (Cth), regs 13.02, 13.03, 13.04
Cases cited: Teese v Long [2003] FCA 274
Date of hearing: 16 November 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Appellants: The first appellant appeared in person on behalf of both appellants.
Solicitor for the Respondent: H Van Ravels of Gadens Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1126 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: GAMBHIR WATTS
First Appellant
BHOJI WATTS
Second Appellant
AND: BENDIGO & ADELAIDE BANK LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: KATZMANN J DATE OF ORDER: 17 DECEMBER 2010 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate