Mirja Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1435

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Mirja Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1435 Citation: Mirja Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1435

Parties: MIRJA HELENA DENLAY v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

File number: QUD 348 of 2010

Judge: LOGAN J

Date of judgment: 17 December 2010

Date of hearing: 14 - 16 September 2010

Place: Brisbane

Division: GENERAL DIVISION

Category: No Catchwords

Number of paragraphs: 1

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr BW Walker SC with Mr GES Ng

Solicitor for the Applicant: Nyst Lawyers

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Robertson SC and Mr M Wigney SC with Mr P Looney

Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 348 of 2010

BETWEEN: MIRJA HELENA DENLAY

Applicant

AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Respondent

JUDGE: LOGAN J DATE OF ORDER: 17 DECEMBER 2010 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 348 of 2010

BETWEEN: MIRJA HELENA DENLAY

Applicant

AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Respondent

JUDGE: LOGAN J DATE: 17 DECEMBER 2010 PLACE: BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 For the reasons outlined in my judgment in proceeding QUD 347 of 2010 – Kevin Vincent Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation (Kevin Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1434) the application is dismissed with costs. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Logan.