Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kazar, in the matter of Frontier Architects Pty Limited (in liq) (No 2)[2010] FCA 1474 Citation: Kazar, in the matter of Frontier Architects Pty Limited (in liq) (No 2) [2010] FCA 1474
Parties: HENRY JOSEPH KAZAR IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATOR OF FRONTIER ARCHITECTS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 099 631 982) v ROUHOLLAH KARGARIAN AND ANOR; HENRY JOSEPH KAZAR IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATOR OF TECHNO BUILD DEVELOPMENTS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVER & MANAGER APPOINTED) (ACN 066 616 091) v ROUHIYEH KARGARIAN
File numbers: ACD 51 of 2009 ACD 52 of 2009
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 24 December 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – two proceedings heard at same time – apportionment of costs across the two proceedings
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 43, 51A
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Seal-A-Fridge Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 681, cited BHP Billiton Iron Ore Pty Ltd v National Competition Council (No 2) [2007] FCA 557, cited Campaign Master (UK) Ltd v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 545, cited Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2007] FCA 1515, 168 IR 353, cited Dias Aluminium Products Pty Ltd v Ullrich Aluminium Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] FCA 1400, 225 ALR 569, cited Dodds Family Investments Pty Ltd (formerly Solar Tint Pty Ltd) v Lane Industries Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 261, cited Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Figgins Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] FCA 602, considered Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc.) (1986) ATPR 40-748, followed JMVB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Camoflag Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] FCA 1490, cited Kazar, in the matter of Frontier Architects Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1381, cited Milne v Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania (1956) 95 CLR 460, cited Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865, 115 FCR 229, cited Schindler Lifts (Aust) Pty Ltd v Debelak (1989) 89 ALR 275, cited State Bank of New South Wales Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 62 FCR 371, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate