Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lee v Professional Services Review Committee No 292 (No 2) [2010] FCA 1490 Citation: Lee v Professional Services Review Committee No 292 (No 2) [2010] FCA 1490
Parties: IL-SONG LEE v PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW COMMITTEE NO 292, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF MEDICARE AUSTRALIA and DETERMINING AUTHORITY IL-SONG LEE v PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW COMMITTEE NO 348, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF MEDICARE AUSTRALIA and DETERMINING AUTHORITY
File number(s): NSD 989 of 2010 NSD 1112 of 2010
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether applicant should be granted leave to reopen his case after judgment reserved and amend his application for an order of review
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 1979 O 6 r 8, O 13 r 2 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) ss 84 and 85
Cases cited: Bing! Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 1761
Date of hearing: 22 December 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Robinson with Ms B Tronson
Solicitor for the Applicant: Unsworth Legal Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms R Henderson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 989 of 2010
BETWEEN: IL-SONG LEE
Applicant
AND: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW COMMITTEE NO 292
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate