Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taekwondo Australia Ltd v TKD Sports Taekwondo Australia Incorporated [2010] FCA 1492 Citation: Taekwondo Australia Ltd v TKD Sports Taekwondo Australia Incorporated [2010] FCA 1492
Parties: TAEKWONDO AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 139 237 522) v TKD SPORTS TAEKWONDO AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED (ABN 61 535 890 915), JOHN KOTSIFAS and STUART LEE
File number: SAD 171 of 2010
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 16 December 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory injunction – whether there is a serious question to be tried – whether the balance of convenience favours the granting of an injunction
Cases cited: American Cyanamid Co-Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 not followed Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 followed Beecham Group v Bristol Laboratories (1968) 118 CLR 618 followed
Date of hearing: 16 December 2010
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S Walsh
Solicitor for the Applicant: Griffins Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr G Harris
Solicitor for the Respondents: Lander & Rogers Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 171 of 2010
BETWEEN: TAEKWONDO AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 139 237 522)
Applicant
AND: TKD SPORTS TAEKWONDO AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED (ABN 61 535 890 915)
First Respondent
JOHN KOTSIFAS
Second Respondent
STUART LEE
Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate