Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liprini v Liprini (No 2) [2010] FCA 1495 Citation: Liprini v Liprini (No 2) [2010] FCA 1495
Appeal from: Liprini v Liprini [2010] FMCA 687
Parties: ALLAN STEPHEN LIPRINI v KEVIN LIPRINI
File numbers: NSD 1237 of 2010 NSD 1238 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 19 November 2010
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 25 r 5
Cases cited: Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235
Date of hearing: 19 November 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondent: M. Roset
Solicitor for the Respondent: Redmond Hale Simpson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1237 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ALLAN STEPHEN LIPRINI
Appellant
AND: KEVIN LIPRINI
Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 19 NOVEMBER 2010 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs. 3. The costs in paragraph 2 above be paid out of the appellant's estate on the same priority as the making of the sequestration order. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1238 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate