Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1516 Citation: Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1516
Parties: COMCARE v JOHN HOLLAND RAIL PTY LTD (ABN 61 009 252 653) and JOHN HOLLAND PTY LTD (ABN 11 004 282 268)
File number: VID 660 of 2008
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 20 October 2010
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act (Cth) 1976 s 37M
Date of hearing: 20 October 2010
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P O'Grady
Solicitor for the Applicant: Thomsons Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Wyles SC with Dr McEvoy
Solicitor for the Respondents: Herbert Geer
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 660 of 2008
BETWEEN: COMCARE
Applicant
AND: JOHN HOLLAND RAIL PTY LTD (ABN 61 009 252 653)
First Respondent
JOHN HOLLAND PTY LTD (ABN 11 004 282 268)
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BROMBERG J DATE OF ORDER: 20 OCTOBER 2010 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondents' notice of motion dated 14 October 2010 be adjourned for hearing at the trial of this proceeding, commencing on 7 March 2011. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 660 of 2008
BETWEEN: COMCARE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate