Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Carey v Singh [2010] FCA 1518 Citation: Carey v Singh [2010] FCA 1518
Parties: NORMAN PHILLIP CAREY v AVENDRA SINGH, GEOFFREY PAUL STANDEN, PAUL ANTHONY BANNON, BRADLEY PAUL KERMOND, SIMON HUGH FRASER, ANTHONY CHRISTOPHER RUMORE, GREGORY ALLEN SKEHAN, PETER JOHN MORAN, DUNSTAN DE SOUZA, ALEXANDER OSTERMAYER, JOHN LAURENCE BOWMAN, ANTONY PAUL RIORDAN, EDWARD DOMINIC CRENNAN, DAVID SUTHERLAND KENNEDY, GARY DAVID NEWTON, PETER JOHN HARKIN, GAVIN WILLIAM CREIGHTON, ANTHONY FREDERICK PERKINS, STUART WILLIAM HETHERINGTON, SAM ANTHONY INGUI, BRENDAN PAUL MAIER, KRISTEN LOPES, DAVID EDWARD MILLER, LINDA MURPHY, MARTIN JOHN DEUTSCH, MARK ANDREW RADFORD and KEITH BRENDAN BETHLEHEM
File number: WAD 279 of 2010
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 18 November 2010
Date of hearing: 18 November 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Metaxas
Solicitor for the Applicant: Metaxas & Hager
Counsel for the First, Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Mr GD Cobby
Solicitor for the First, Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Kott Gunning
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 279 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate