Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Stuart-Mahoney [2011] FCA 56 Citation: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Stuart-Mahoney [2011] FCA 56
Appeal from: Stuart-Mahoney v CFMEU & Anor (No 2) [2008] FMCA 1015 and Stuart-Mahoney v CFMEU & Nor (No 3) [2008] FMCA 1435
Parties: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and JASON DEANS v KAREN STUART-MAHONEY
File number(s): VID 957 of 2008
Judge: RYAN J
Date of judgment: 8 February 2011
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeal from Federal Magistrates Court – civil penalty proceedings – whether there was action or threat of action having prejudicial effect on employment – whether onus of negativing proscribed reason reversed by s 809 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) EVIDENCE – application of s 140 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether pleaded allegation sufficiently established by the evidence – whether inference of contravening conduct more probable than other available inferences PECUNIARY PENALTIES – appeal from Federal Magistrates Court – whether pecuniary penalties imposed for contravention of ss 789 and 790 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) were excessive
Legislation: Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 789, 790, 797, 809 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140 Building, Construction and Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth)
Cases cited: Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170; 110 ALR 449 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2007) 162 FCR 466 Qantas Airways Limited v Gama (2008) 167 FCR 537 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Cabal v United Mexican States (2001) 108 FCR 311 Hadgkiss v CFMEU (2008) 166 FCR 376 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Construction, Forestry, Mining, Energy Union v Safety Glass Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 989 Australian Building & Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2010] FCA 977 Stuart v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2010) 185 FCR 308 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill (2010) 269 ALR 1 Cozadinos v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2010] FCA 48 Stuart-Mahoney v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2008] FCA 1426; (2008) 177 IR 61 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Williams [2009] FCAFC 171; (2010) 262 ALR 417 A & L Silvestri Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2008] FCA 466 Hardwick v Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union [2010] FCA 818; 198 IR 312 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate