Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZOMF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 57 Citation: SZOMF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 57
Appeal from: SZOMF v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 776
Parties: SZOMF v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1233 of 2010
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 8 February 2011
Corrigendum: 9 February 2011
Date of hearing: 7 February 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 31
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: A Crittenden
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Clayton Utz
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZOMF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 57
CORRIGENDUM
1. In paragraph 12 of the Reasons for Judgment, the word 'delegate' be added to the end of the sentence to read 'The Tribunal was not satisfied that the appellant had a well-founded fear of persecution for any Convention-related reason and affirmed the decision of the delegate'. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice McKerracher.
Associate: Dated: 9 February 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1233 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZOMF
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate