Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2011] FCA 63 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2011] FCA 63
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v EMMANUEL GEORGE CASSIMATIS and JULIE GLADYS CASSIMATIS
File number: QUD 574 of 2010
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 4 February 2011
Catchwords: HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT – apprehended bias – adverse findings as to credit made in a related judgment – whether reasonable apprehension of bias - recusal
Legislation: Constitution (Cth) ch III Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Storm Financial Ltd (recs and mgrs appointed) (admin apptd) (ACN 064 804 691) and Others (2009) 71 ACSR 81 cited Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 applied Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 applied MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2010] FCA 1390 cited
Date of hearing: 4 February 2011
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Flanagan SC with Mr S Cooper
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S Doyle SC with Mr P Franco
Solicitor for the Respondents: Russell and Company
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 574 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate