Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Green v Bradbury [2011] FCA 71 Citation: Green v Bradbury [2011] FCA 71
Parties: ANDREW GREEN v DAVID BRADBURY, AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY (NSW) and AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION
File number(s): NSD 1668 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 3 February 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – court of disputed returns – electoral petition filed – validity of election disputed – whether petition set out facts relied upon to invalidate election or return – whether petition set out facts capable of supporting allegation of bribery, corruption or undue influence – whether petition set out facts capable of supporting allegations of other illegal practices – whether petition set out facts bearing upon the casting or counting of votes – whether petition set out facts demonstrating that the result of the election was likely to have been affected – whether political party correctly joined as respondent to petition
Legislation: Commonwealth Electoral Act 1902 (Cth) ss 194, 196, 200 Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) ss 184, 188, 189, 192, 194, 195A, 326, 327, 328, 338, 352, 353, 354, 355, 358, 359, 360, 362, 363A, 364, 365, 368, 369, 375, 533 Constitution ss 48, 49 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 28
Cases cited: Cole v Lacey (1965) 112 CLR 45 Hansen v Australian Electoral Commission [2000] FCA 606 Kelly v Campbell [2002] FCA 1125 Maloney v McEacharn (1904) 1 CLR 77 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Sykes v Australian Electoral Commission (1993) 115 ALR 645 Watson v J & A G Johnson Limited (1936) 55 CLR 63 Webster v Deahm (1993) 116 ALR 223 Whitby v Garlett (2000) 98 FCR 385
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate