Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Freemantle v O'Neill [2011] FCA 72 Citation: Freemantle v O'Neill [2011] FCA 72
Parties: GRAHAM FREEMANTLE v DEBORAH O'NEILL, AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY (NSW) and AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION
File number(s): NSD 1665 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 3 February 2011
Legislation: Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) ss 352, 355, 533
Cases cited: Green v Bradbury [2011] FCA 71
Dates of hearing: 31 January and 1 February 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Petitioner: P. E. King
Solicitor for the Petitioner: James R G Bell
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: B. Walker SC, A. D. Lang
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Slater and Gordon
Counsel for the Third Respondent: G. R. Kennett SC
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1665 of 2010
BETWEEN: GRAHAM FREEMANTLE
Petitioner
AND: DEBORAH O'NEILL
First Respondent
AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY (NSW)
Second Respondent
AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION
Third Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 3 FEBRUARY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate