Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Khan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 75 Citation: Khan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 75
Appeal from: Khan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FMCA 546
Parties: MOHAMMAD SAIFUR RAHMAN KHAN, MANZIR YASMIN EMON and MARZUQ RAHMAN KHAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1146 of 2010
Judge: MOORE J
Date of judgment: 11 February 2011
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of Federal Magistrates Court of Australia dismissing application for review of a decision of Migration Review Tribunal to affirm decision of Minister to refuse visa – at the time of the Minister's decision, information provided by the visa applicant was found to be false and misleading in material particular – additional information furnished after the Minister's decision which may sustain the conclusion sought to be reached in reliance on false and misleading information – the question to be asked is whether, prior to or at the time of the Minister's decision, the body charged with assessing the applicant's qualifications was misled
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 29(1)(b), Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) item 1128CA of Schedule 1, clause 880.2 of Schedule 2
Cases cited: Berenguel v Minister for Immigration (2010) 264 ALR 417 Kim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 44 FCR 75 Meeuwissen v Boden (2010) 55 MCR 174 Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Dela Cruz (1992) 34 FCR 348 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1994] FCA 1011 Wong v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 37 ALD 51
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate