Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZOMS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 90 Citation: SZOMS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 90
Appeal from: SZOMS v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 778
Parties: SZOMS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1370 of 2010
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 14 February 2011
Date of hearing: 11 February 2010
Place: Sydney (via video-link to Perth)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: G Johnson
Solicitor for the Respondents: DLA Phillips Fox
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1370 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZOMS
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MCKERRACHER J DATE OF ORDER: 14 February 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (VIA VIDEO-LINK TO PERTH)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant is to pay the costs of the first respondent, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1370 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate