Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King v Australian Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2011] FCA 95 Citation: King v Australian Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2011] FCA 95
Parties: ROBYN KING v AUSTRALIAN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 43 of 2010
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 8 February 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – subpoena for production of documents – objection – scope – relevance.
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 340, s 546
Cases cited: Brand v Digi-Tech (Aust) Ltd [2001] NSWSC 425 GB (By His Tutor), FB v Western Sydney Area Health Service [2010] NSWSC 181 The Food Improvers Pty Ltd & Anor v BGR Corporation Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) (2006) 155 FCR 216 Santos Ltd v Pipelines Authority of South Australia (1996) 66 SASR 38
Date of hearing: 8 February 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms S Ryan of Turner Freeman
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms J Sutherland of Blake Dawson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 43 of 2010
BETWEEN: ROBYN KING
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Respondent
JUDGE: KATZMANN J DATE OF ORDER: 8 FEBRUARY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Paragraph 1 (d) of the schedule to the subpoenas issued to the following persons is amended so as to limit the production of the documents referred to in it to documents made or generated from 8 October 2008: (a) Dr Heba Mankarious; (b) Dr Jane Elizabeth Thomson; (c) Dr Martine Anne Walker; (d) The Mosman Practice. 2. The notice of motion is otherwise dismissed. 3. Until further order, production of documents on subpoena to the above persons or entities is restricted to the applicant, the legal representatives of the parties and experts they retain for the purpose of the proceeding. The applicant is to have first access. 4. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate