Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Roe v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2011] FCA 102 Citation: Roe v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2011] FCA 102
Parties: JOSEPH ROE AND CYRIL SHAW v THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS
File number: WAD 6002 of 1998
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 15 February 2011
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application to replace current applicant – s 66B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether proposed applicants are descendants of apical ancestors – authorisation meeting – construction of authorisation resolution – whether conflict of interests – exercise of discretion
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 66B
Cases cited: Anderson v Western Australia [2007] FCA 1733 Bolton on behalf of the Southern Noongar Families v Western Australia [2004] FCA 760 Bullen v Western Australia [2010] FCA 900 Butchulla People v Queensland (2006) 154 FCR 233 Combined Gunggandji Claim v Queensland [2005] FCA 575 Coyne v Western Australia [2009] FCA 533 Daniel v Western Australia (2002) 194 ALR 278 Dann v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 99 De Rose v South Australia (2003) 133 FCR 325 Doolan v Native Title Registrar (2007) 158 FCR 56 Holborow v Western Australia [2002] FCA 1428 Lennon v South Australia [2010] FCA 743 Mabo v Queensland [No. 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 Njamal People v Western Australia [2007] FCA 1054 Noble v Murgha [2005] FCAFC 211 Norilya Minerals Pty Ltd v Ireland [2010] WASC 260 Pooncarie Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v NSW Minister for Land & Water Conservation [2006] FCA 25 Quandamooka People (No 1) v Queensland [2002] FCA 259 Roe v Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation [2010] FCA 809 Rubibi Community v State of Western Australia (No 5) [2005] FCA 1025 Sambo v Western Australia (2008) 172 FCR 271 Ward v Northern Territory [2002] FCA 171
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate