Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lanciana v Gangemi [2011] FCA 115 Citation: Lanciana v Gangemi [2011] FCA 115
Parties: PASQUALE LANCIANA, RICHARD OSBORNE and KOUROSH JAFFARI v ANTONIO GANGEMI, STEPHEN ROBERT DIXON (AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ANTONIO GANGEMI, THE DEBTOR) and JOHN ADAMS ( AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ANTONIO GANGEMI, THE DEBTOR)
File number: VID 742 of 2009
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 4 February 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Late application for discovery – Application for vacation of trial dates – Case management considerations – Applications refused
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175
Date of hearing: 4 February 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the First Applicant: First Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Second Applicant: Mr M. Gronow
Solicitor for the Second Applicant: Christopher Bunnett Lawyers
Counsel for the Third Applicant: Mr Strang
Solicitor for the Third Applicant: Melbourne Legal Partners
Counsel for the First Respondent: First Respondent appeared in person
Counsel for the Second and Third Respondents: Mr P. Agardy
Solicitor for the Second and Third Respondents: Lewis Haldway Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate