Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Styles v Clayton Utz [2011] FCA 125 Citation: Styles v Clayton Utz [2011] FCA 125
Parties: BRIDGETTE REBECCA STYLES v CLAYTON UTZ
File number(s): NSD 776 of 2010
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 18 February 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Transfer of Proceedings
Legislation: Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1976 (Cth) s5
Date of hearing: 15 February 2011
Date of last submissions: 15 February 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: K Nomchong
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 776 of 2010
BETWEEN: BRIDGETTE REBECCA STYLES
Applicant
AND: CLAYTON UTZ
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 16 FEBRUARY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Transfer proceeding NSD 776 of 2010 (Bridgette Rebecca Styles v Clayton Utz) to the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. 2. Costs are to be costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 776 of 2010
BETWEEN: BRIDGETTE REBECCA STYLES
Applicant
AND: CLAYTON UTZ
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate