Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bird v McComb [2011] FCA 129 Citation: Bird v McComb [2011] FCA 129
Parties: SUZANNE CHRISTINE BIRD v JOHN EDMUND MCCOMB, BRIMIN GEM PTY LTD (ACN 056 330 333), SCB HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 085 917 371), CARRIAGES PTY LTD (ACN 063 116 852) and NEWTOUN PTY LTD (ACN 006 858 788)
File number(s): QUD 10 of 2011
Judge: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 18 February 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – consideration of an application for an interlocutory injunction so as to prevent alteration of registers of directors and members pending the determination of the principal proceeding – consideration of an interlocutory injunction to restrain entities from disposing of assets pending the determination of the principal proceeding PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE- consideration of an application for interlocutory injunction
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 175, s 1324
Cases cited: ABC v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 – cited Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 – cited
Date of hearing: 17 February 2011
Date of last submissions: 17 February 2011
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 47
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr J Griffin QC and Mr A B Johnson
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Mr P G Mylne, Mylne Lawyers
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr H A ScottMackenzie
Solicitor for the Defendants: Mr D Hamilton, Tucker & Cowen Solicitors
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 10 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate