Ugur v Australian Human Rights Commission [2011] FCA 144

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Ugur v Australian Human Rights Commission [2011] FCA 144 Citation: Ugur v Australian Human Rights Commission [2011] FCA 144

Appeal from: Ugur v Australian Human Rights Commission [2010] AATA 144

Parties: H E O UGUR v AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

File number: NSD 886 of 2010

Judge: BUCHANAN J

Date of judgment: 24 February 2011

Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44, 33, 39 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 11

Cases cited: Bahonko v Sterjov (2008) 166 FCR 415 Ugur v Australian Human Rights Commission [2010] AATA 144 Ugur v New South Wales Police Service [2005] FCA 48 Ugur v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [2008] FCA 1461 Ugur v Police Service of New South Wales [2004] FCA 1032

Date of hearing: 17 February 2011

Place: Sydney

Division: GENERAL DIVISION

Category: No catchwords

Number of paragraphs: 31

Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person.

Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms M Lindley of Australian Human Rights Commission

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 886 of 2010

BETWEEN: H E O UGUR

Applicant

AND: AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Respondent

JUDGE: BUCHANAN J DATE OF ORDER: 24 february 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The application is dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.