Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
R2M Pty Limited v Gourlay [2011] FCA 168 Citation: R2M Pty Limited v Gourlay [2011] FCA 168
Parties: R2M PTY LIMITED v ROBERT CLYDE GOURLAY
File number: ACD 32 of 2010
Judge: BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 3 March 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application to set aside a statutory demand – genuine dispute – whether a statutory demand should be set aside pursuant to s 459J of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) on the basis that the affidavit accompanying the statutory demand was sworn or affirmed prior to the date of the statutory demand COSTS – indemnity costs – whether any realistic prospect of denying the existence of a genuine dispute
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459E, 459G, 459H, 459J, 459S
Cases cited: Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 Chadmar Enterprises Pty Ltd v IGA Distribution Pty Ltd (2005) 190 FLR 466 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Ri-Co Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd v Allied Sandblasters Pty Ltd (2009) 231 FLR 139 Wildtown Holdings Pty Ltd v Rural Traders Co Ltd (2002) 172 FLR 35
Date of hearing: 28 February 2011
Place: Sydney (via video link to Canberra)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 44
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr B F Katekar
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Williams Love & Nicol
Counsel for the Defendant: Mr P A Walker
Solicitor for the Defendant: Goodman Law
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate