Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Velissaris v Fitzgerald [2011] FCA 197 Citation: Velissaris v Fitzgerald [2011] FCA 197
Parties: GEORGE VELISSARIS v LAURENCE A FITZGERALD and AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
File number(s): VID 26 of 2011
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2011
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: Gematech Pty Ltd v Bardi Investments Pty Ltd (2008) NSWSC 196 Pine Forest of Australia (Canberra) Pty Ltd (2010) NSWSC 1127 Re United Medical Protection Limited (2003) 47 ASCR 705 Re Warbler Pty Ltd (1982) 1 ACLC 323
Date of hearing: 2 March 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: The First Respondent did not appear
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr A Muller
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 26 of 2011
BETWEEN: GEORGE VELISSARIS
Applicant
AND: LAURENCE A FITZGERALD
First Respondent
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MIDDLETON J DATE OF ORDER: 2 MARCH 2011 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. No order as to costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate