Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Secretary, Department of Defence v Perry [2011] FCA 214 Citation: Secretary, Department of Defence v Perry [2011] FCA 214
Appeal from: Perry and Secretary, Department of Defence [2010] AATA 458
Parties: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE v RAYMOND PERRY
File number: QUD 277 of 2010
Judge: DOWSETT J
Date of judgment: 15 March 2011
Catchwords: DEFENCE – Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme – application for subsidy certificate – meaning of effective service – eligibility for a subsidy credit – the effect of Regulation 20 of the Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Regulations 2008 (Cth)
Legislation: Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Act 2008 (Cth) ss 3, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 22, 25, 27, 44, 46, 47, 71, 76 Defence Act 1903 (Cth) s 30 Air Force Act 1923 (Cth) ss 4A, 4B, 4C Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Defence Home Ownership Assistance Scheme Regulations 2008 (Cth) regs 8, 15, 20
Date of hearing: 5 November 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 44
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr SA McLeod
Solicitor for the Appellant: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 277 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE
Appellant
AND: RAYMOND PERRY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate