Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 5) [2011] FCA 216 Citation: Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 5) [2011] FCA 216
Parties: LYNX ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PTY LTD (ACN 059 949 469) v THE ANI CORPORATION LIMITED TRADING AS ANI BRADKEN RAIL TRANSPORTATION GROUP (ACN 000 421 358), BRADKEN RESOURCES PTY LTD (ACN 098 300 988), BRADKEN LIMITED (ACN 108 693 009) and WORLEYPARSONS SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 001 279 812)
File number: WAD 219 of 2006
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 11 March 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – O 16 of the Federal Court Rules – leave to administer interrogatories – interrogatories sufficiently confined – whether interrogatories are premature – whether interrogatories are fishing – whether the certification to the pleadings under O 11 r 1B(1) of the Federal Court Rules is relevant to prematurity or fishing arguments
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 77(2)(a) Federal Court Rules O 11 r 1B(1), O 16 r 1, O 16 r 5, O 18 r 2
Cases cited: Attorney-General (UK) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (1987) 8 NSWLR 341 Austal Ships Pty Ltd v Incat Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) (2010) 272 ALR 177 BioOne Pty Ltd v Australian Biodiesel Group Ltd [2008] FCA 709 Bradken Resources Pty Ltd v Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd (2010) 187 FCR 476 Coco v AM Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 Kruger Transport Equipment Pty Ltd v Glen Cameron Storage & Distribution Pty Ltd (2008) 78 RPR 262 Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 2) [2009] FCA 363 Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 4) [2010] FCA 1114 Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd (2001) 210 CLR 181 O Mustod & Son v S. Allcock & Co Ltd and Dosen [1963] 3 All ER 416 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (2008) 169 FCR 435 Sharpe v Smail (1975) 5 ALR 377 The Commonwealth v Walsh (1980) 147 CLR 61
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate