Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 8) [2011] FCA 221 Citation: Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 8) [2011] FCA 221
Parties: SUNLAND WATERFRONT (BVI) LTD and SUNLAND GROUP PTY LTD ACN 063 429 532 v PRUDENTIA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 091 390 742, HANLEY INVESTMENTS PTE LTD, ANGUS JOHN LUXMOORE REED and MATTHEW JAMES JOYCE
File number: QUD 195 of 2009
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 15 March 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Discovery
Legislation: Supreme Court of Judicature Acts of 1873 and 1875 (UK) Federal Court Rules O 15 r 2(3), O 15 r 2 (6), O 15 r 5(3), O 15 r 6, O 15 r 8 High Court Rules 1952 O 13 r 18
Cases cited: Australian Independent Newspapers Limited v John Fairfax Holdings Limited [1994] FCA 1167 cited Brookfield v Yevad Products Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1376 considered Jones v The Monte Video Gas Company (1879-1880) LR 5 QBD 556 cited Lonrho Limited v Shell Petroleum (1980) 1 WLR 627 applied Metcash Trading v Bunn (2010) 263 ALR 132 followed Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341 considered Procter v Kalivis (No 2) [2010] FCA 663 considered Re McGorm, Ex parte Co operative Building Society of South Australia (1989) 20 FCR 387 applied Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2005] FCA 915 cited Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 863 cited Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 932 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate