Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Minister for Home Affairs [2011] FCA 225 Citation: Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Minister for Home Affairs [2011] FCA 225
Parties: KIMBERLY-CLARK AUSTRALIA PTY LTD and SCA HYGIENE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CUSTOMS, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY-GENERAL, PT PINDO DELI PULP MILLS and GOLD HONG YE PAPER (SUZHOU INDUSTRIAL PARK) CO LTD
File number: NSD 342 of 2010
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2011
Catchwords: CUSTOMS & EXCISE – judicial review of revocation of dumping duty notice and anterior decisions following applications to Trade Measures Review Officer ('TMRO') for review of dumping duty decision and TMRO report to Minister on review applications – whether TMRO authorised to recommend that 'all of the findings made by Customs be reinvestigated' having regard to limitation in s 269ZZK(1)(b) of Customs Act 1901 (Cth) ('the Act') – meaning of 'findings specified' having regard to definition of the word 'finding' in s 269ZX – whether specification of conclusion encompasses findings of fact and reasoning based thereon leading to conclusion – whether Customs' conclusion on review that injury caused by dumping was not material was infected with error because it reasoned that injury was caused more by other factors than dumping. Held: TMRO recommendation and all consequential decisions up to and including revocation decision authorised by the Act; Customs reasoning on conclusion of no material injury caused by dumping not infected with alleged error of reasoning.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate