Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 253 Citation: Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 253
Parties: COMCARE v JOHN HOLLAND RAIL PTY LTD (ABN 61 009 252 653) and JOHN HOLLAND PTY LTD (ABN 11 004 282 268)
File number: VID 660 of 2008
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Pleadings - application to strike out statement of claim – applicable principles
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Occupational Health & Safety Act 1991 (Cth) ss 9A, 16
Cases cited: ACCC v Craftmatic Australia Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 972 ACCC v Pauls [1999] FCA 1750 Kirk v Industrial Relations Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531 State of Queensland v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 499
Date of hearing: 16 March 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 36
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Rozen
Solicitor for the Applicant: Thomsons Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Wyles SC with Dr T McEvoy
Solicitor for the Respondents: Herbert Geer
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 660 of 2008
BETWEEN: COMCARE
Applicant
AND: JOHN HOLLAND RAIL PTY LTD (ABN 61 009 252 653)
First Respondent
JOHN HOLLAND PTY LTD (ABN 11 004 282 268)
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate