Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singtel Optus Pty Limited v Vodafone Pty Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 260 Citation: Singtel Optus Pty Limited v Vodafone Pty Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 260
Parties: SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 833 208) v VODAFONE PTY LIMITED (ACN 062 954 554)
File number: NSD 1733 of 2010
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 25 March 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – Costs of application for interlocutory relief –application for interlocutory relief dismissed – undertaking given by respondent during hearing material to decision – appropriate costs order – respondent's costs to be its costs in the proceeding
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 62, r 29
Cases cited: Singtel Optus Pty Limited v Vodafone Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1448 Ausino International Pty Ltd v Apex Sports Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1119 Westpoint Finance Pty Ltd v The Chocolate Factory Apartments Ltd [2002] NSWCA 287
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 7 February 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr HPT Bevan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R Lancaster SC and Mr C Bova
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens Arthur Robinson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1733 of 2010
BETWEEN: SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 052 833 208)
Applicant
AND: VODAFONE PTY LIMITED
(ACN 062 954 554)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate