Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Combined Insurance Company of America trading as Combined Insurance Company of Australia v Trifunovski (No 4) [2011] FCA 271 Citation: Combined Insurance Company of America trading as Combined Insurance Company of Australia v Trifunovski (No 4) [2011] FCA 271
Parties: COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA T/A COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA v BLAGOJA TRIFUNOVSKI, HERACLEA PTY LIMITED ACN 007 437 372, JOSEPH VIVIL RIENZIE PERIES, SHANE PEREZ, WILLIAM DICINOSKI and FETIE VICKI DICINOSKI SHANE PEREZ v COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA T/AS COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA RIENZIE PERIIES v COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA T/AS COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA FETIE DICINOSKI v COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA T/AS COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA WILLIAM DICINOSKI v COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA TRADING AS COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA BLAGOJA TRIFUNOVSKI v COMBINED INUSRANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA TRADING AS COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA
File numbers: NSD 1860 of 2008 NSD 643 of 2009 NSD 644 of 2009 NSD 646 of 2009 NSD 647 of 2009 NSD 649 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 14 March 2011
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Admissibility – Tendency evidence – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 97 – whether evidence admissible under s 97 to show tendency of corporation – whether evidence of significant probative value
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate