Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Murphy v Westpac Banking Corporation [2011] FCA 280 Citation: Murphy v Westpac Banking Corporation [2011] FCA 280
Parties: LOUISE MURPHY v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141 WILLIAM LAWSON v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141
File number(s): NSD 1157 of 2009NSD 690 of 2010
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 29 March 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend statement of claim – whether proposed amended statement of claim insufficiently particularised – whether conditions should be imposed on grant of leave
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 13 r 2
Cases cited: Celestino v Celestino [1990] FCA 449 Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Co Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, Santow J, 16 October 1996) Murran Investments Pty Ltd v Aromatic Beauty Products Pty Ltd (2000) 191 ALR 579; [2000] FCA 1732 SLE Worldwide Australia Pty Ltd v Wyatt Gallagher Bassett Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 816
Date of hearing: 22 March 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr D P O'Dowd
Solicitor for the Applicants: Gillis Delaney Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M J Steele
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens Arthur Robinson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1157 of 2009
BETWEEN: LOUISE MURPHY
Applicant
AND: WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate