Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Croker v Commonwealth of Australia [2011] FCA 312 Citation: Croker v Commonwealth of Australia [2011] FCA 312
Parties: CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File numbers: NSD 1276 of 2010 NSD 1581 of 2010
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 1 April 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of Full Court decision pending application for special leave – power of single Judge – stay refused – no prospects of success
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2)(d)
Cases cited: Commissioner of Taxation v Australian National Hotels Ltd (1989) 63 ALJR 344, cited Commonwealth of Australia v Croker [2010] FMCA 852, cited Croker v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] FCA 1031, cited Croker v Commonwealth of Australia [2011] FCAFC 25, cited Edelsten v Ward (No 2) (1988) 63 ALJR 346, referred to Employment Services Australia Pty Ltd v Poniatowska [2010] FCA 1043, cited George v Fletcher (No 2) [2010] FCA 655, cited Guss v Johnstone [2000] FCA 1455, cited Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 681, considered Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Manaf (No 2) [2009] FCA 993, cited New Zealand v Moloney [2006] FCA 1363, cited Rahme v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1993) 117 ALR 618, referred to SZKUO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1570, cited Wainter Pty Ltd; In the matter of New Tel Ltd [2005] FCA 1224, 54 ACSR 554, cited Westpac Banking Corporation v Tsatsoulis [2003] FCA 406, cited Daley, J. "Interlocutory Orders Pending High Court Litigation" (1995) 13 Australian Bar Review 41
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate