Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kell & Rigby Building Pty Limited v Shephard [2011] FCA 324 Citation: Kell & Rigby Building Pty Limited v Shephard [2011] FCA 324
Parties: KELL & RIGBY BUILDING PTY LIMITED v ADAM SHEPARD, BLUE MOUNTAINS MEGACINEMA PTY LIMITED, MASAAKI WAKABAYSHI
File number: NSD 1770 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 4 March 2011
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 447A
Date of hearing: 4 March 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Plaintiff: M. R. Aldridge SC
Solicitors for the Plaintiff: Sally Nash & Co
Counsel for the Defendants: M. Rosenblatt
Solicitors for the Defendants: Somerset Ryckmans
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1770 of 2010
BETWEEN: KELL & RIGBY BUILDING PTY LIMITED
Plaintiff
AND: ADAM SHEPHARD
First Defendant
BLUE MOUNTAINS MEGACINEMA PTY LIMITED
Second Defendant
MASAAKI WAKABAYSHI
Third Defendant
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 4 March 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs on an indemnity basis. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1770 of 2010
BETWEEN: KELL & RIGBY BUILDING PTY LIMITED
Plaintiff
AND: ADAM SHEPHARD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate