Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stewart v The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 336 Citation: Stewart v The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 336
Parties: ANTHONY STEWART, PAUL HOGAN and JOHN SYDNEY CORNELL v THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION, PETER ZDJELAR and THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: NSD 330 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 April 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Procedural fairness – departure from non-statutory guidelines – reviewability under Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) – general reviewability under Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) INCOME TAX – Administration – Accountants' Concession – applicability to documents neither in possession of taxpayer nor taxpayer's external accountant – reviewability of decision to grant access
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 3 Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) s 59(7) Constitution ss 61, 75(iii), 75(v) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 8, 264 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 1.7 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(c) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 3A
Cases cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 cited Consolidated Press Holding Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 57 FCR 348 cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 cited Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v The Australian Workers' Union (2004) 221 CLR 309 cited One.Tel Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 101 FCR 548 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 cited White Industries Australia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 160 FCR 298 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate