Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Building & Construction Commissioner v Abbott (No 3) [2011] FCA 340 Citation: Australian Building & Construction Commissioner v Abbott (No 3) [2011] FCA 340
Parties: AUSTRALIAN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSIONER v BENJAMIN ABBOTT AND THE PARTIES IN ATTACHED SCHEDULE 1
File number: WAD 230 of 2008
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 8 April 2011
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – declaratory relief – orders on default – non-compliance with court orders – whether applicant is entitled to relief on the statement of claim
Legislation: Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) ss 38, 49(1)(a) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 494(1), 719 Federal Court Rules O 35A r 2(2)(b), (c)
Cases cited: Arthur v Vaupotic Investments Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 433 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v 1 CellNet LLC [2005] FCA 856 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Albert (2005) 223 ALR 467 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (2006) 236 ALR 665 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (2007) 244 ALR 300 Bank of Kuwait and the Middle East v The Ship MV "Mawashi Al Gasseem" (No 2) (2007) 240 ALR 120 British American Tobacco Australasia Limited v The Person Identified by the Australian Customs Service as "Gory Sabar" [2007] FCA 1417 Deisel Spa v Hwang [2005] FCA 1619 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Seagle (2005) 146 FCR 400 Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 36
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate