Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wang v Purpose Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 381 Citation: Wang v Purpose Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 381
Appeal from: Application for Leave to Appeal: Federal Magistrates Court of Australia (oral decision)
Parties: YUN FU WANG v PURPOSE PTY LTD and ROBERT MURPHY
File number: NSD 256 of 2011
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 15 April 2011
Date of hearing: 14 April 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr CE Dezarnaulds of Peter R Murphy & Co Solicitors
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 256 of 2011
BETWEEN: YUN FU WANG
Applicant
AND: PURPOSE PTY LTD
First Respondent
ROBERT MURPHY
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 15 April 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondents' costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 256 of 2011
BETWEEN: YUN FU WANG
Applicant
AND: PURPOSE PTY LTD
First Respondent
ROBERT MURPHY
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE: 15 April 2011 PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate