Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Amalia Investments Ltd v Virgtel Global Networks N.V. [2011] FCA 409 Citation: Amalia Investments Ltd v Virgtel Global Networks N.V. [2011] FCA 409
Parties: AMALIA INVESTMENTS LTD, AMALIA ZABUSKY and HARVEY ZABUSKY v VIRGTEL GLOBAL NETWORKS N.V., HENDRIK VAN LEEUWEN, MARIA ANTONIA JOSEPHINA ADRIANA VAN LEEUWEN-VAN HAL and VISCAYA ARMADORA S.A.
File number(s): QUD 3 of 2009
Judge: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an application for an order that costs of an interlocutory application be paid forthwith pursuant to Order 62, rule 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules
Legislation: Federal Court Rules, Order 62, rule 3
Cases cited: Allstate Life Insurance Co & Ors v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited & Ors (No. 14) (unreported decision, 18 August 1995, [1995] FCA 660) - cited Allstate Life Insurance Co & Ors v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited & Ors (No. 13) (Full Federal Court, 17 August 1995, unreported [1995] FCA 626) - cited Life Airbag Company of Australia Pty Limited & Ors v Life Airbag Company (New Zealand) Limited & Ors [1998] FCA 545 - cited Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (No. 3) [2004] FCA 347 - cited McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd [1999] FCA 1639 - cited
Date of hearing: 20 April 2011
Date of last submissions: 20 April 2011
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate