Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gleeson v Secretary, Department of Family, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2011] FCA 437 Citation: Gleeson v Secretary, Department of Family, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2011] FCA 437
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Gleeson v Secretary, Department of Family, Housing Community Services & Indigenous Affairs, (Federal Court of Australia, VID 782 of 2009, Orders dated 1 December 2009) (by consent)
Parties: JOHN GLEESON v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
File number: VID 77 of 2011
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 3 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Final judgment by consent – Whether deemed to be interlocutory – Whether leave to appeal required. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Extension of time for filing application for leave to appeal – Whether satisfactory explanation for delay – Whether proposed case of sufficient substance to avoid extension of time being an exercise in futility.
Legislation: Access to Justice (Civil Litigation Reforms) Amendment Act 2009 (Cth) Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) s 57A-2(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 198, 198AAA
Cases cited: Carnemolla v eBay International AG [2008] FCA 1346 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2010] FCA 349 Duus v Dalvella Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 26 Luck v Chief Executive Officer, Centrelink [2009] FCAFC 54 Sharman License Holdings Limited v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 802 SZMTC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 162
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate