FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SZORO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 467 Citation: SZORO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 467 Appeal from: SZORO v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship & Anor [2011] FMCA 84 Parties: SZORO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL File number: NSD 272 of 2011 Judge: MARSHALL J Date of judgment: 10 May 2011 Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) Date of hearing: 10 May 2011 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 4 Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Reilly Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 272 of 2011 ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: SZORO Appellant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 10 MAY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal, to be taxed in default of agreement. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 272 of 2011 ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: SZORO Appellant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE: 10 MAY 2011 PLACE: SYDNEY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The appellant appeals from a decision of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia given on 21 February 2011. 2 Upon the matter being called on for hearing, the appellant has not appeared. 3 Mr T Reilly, counsel for the respondent Minister, asks that I dismiss the appeal under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), and I see no reason not to accede to his request. 4 Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed with costs to be taxed in default of agreement. I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Marshall. Associate: Dated: 10 May 2011