Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BZAAF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 480 Citation: BZAAF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 480
Appeal from: BZAAF v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 979
Parties: BZAAF v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 544 of 2010
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 9 May 2011
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review – allegation that Tribunal failed to take into account relevant considerations under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where Tribunal invited Appellant to provide information to advance his claim – where appellant did not take that opportunity – decision open to the Tribunal – appeal dismissed ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – illogicality and irrationality – where Appellant argued that decision of the Tribunal was illogical – where decision made on available evidence – no irrationality COSTS – gross costs orders – where first respondent sought costs to be fixed as a gross sum – where practice direction not complied with – where no affidavit deposing as to First Respondent assessable cost – where fixing gross costs would be unfair to the unrepresented Appellant – costs be fixed in gross
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 425
Cases cited: Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 followed Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNPG (2010) 115 ALD 303 cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 cited NAVX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 287 followed Aronson et al, "Judicial Review of Administrative Action" (4th ed, Thomson Reuters, 2009)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate