Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Keynes v Rural Directions Pty Ltd (No 5) [2011] FCA 484 Citation: Keynes v Rural Directions Pty Ltd (No 5) [2011] FCA 484
Parties: TIMOTHY DOUGLAS KEYNES, ELIZABETH JANE KEYNES, CHRISTOPHER JOHN MCCOURT and ROBERT NEVILLE KEYNES v RURAL DIRECTIONS PTY LTD, GRAIN POOL PTY LTD, ABB GRAIN PTY LTD and GLENCORE GRAIN PTY LTD
File number: SAD 110 of 2008
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 12 May 2011
Date of hearing: 3 May 2011
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr B M O'Brien
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Proud & Company
Counsel for the First Defendant: Ms J Kinnear
Solicitor for the First Defendant: Fox Tucker
Counsel for the Second Defendant: The Second Defendant did not appear
Counsel for the Third Defendant: Mr B J Doyle
Solicitor for the Third Defendant: Thomsons Lawyers
Counsel for the Fourth Defendant: Mr B J Doyle
Solicitor for the Fourth Defendant: Wallmans Lawyers appeared on behalf of HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 110 of 2008
BETWEEN: TIMOTHY DOUGLAS KEYNES
First Plaintiff
ELIZABETH JANE KEYNES
Second Plaintiff
CHRISTOPHER JOHN MCCOURT
Third Plaintiff
ROBERT NEVILLE KEYNES
Fourth Plaintiff
AND: RURAL DIRECTIONS PTY LTD
First Defendant
GRAIN POOL PTY LTD
Second Defendant
ABB GRAIN PTY LTD
Third Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate