Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Huawei Technologies Company Ltd v Al Amri [2011] FCA 503 Citation: Huawei Technologies Company Ltd v Al Amri [2011] FCA 503
Parties: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LTD v MOOSA EISA AL AMRI
File number: VID 1064 of 2010
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 13 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Failure by respondent to file Defence ordered by court – Whether applicant entitled to summary judgment
Legislation: Federal Court Rules
Date of hearing: 13 May 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms K Beattie
Solicitor for the Applicant: Allens Arthur Robinson
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1064 of 2010
BETWEEN: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LTD
Applicant
AND: MOOSA EISA AL AMRI
Respondent
JUDGE: JESSUP J DATE OF ORDER: 13 MAY 2011 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Australian patent number 2004288303 be wholly revoked; 2. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceeding on a party-party basis. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1064 of 2010
BETWEEN: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LTD
Applicant
AND: MOOSA EISA AL AMRI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate