Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Power Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd (No. 3) [2011] FCA 539 Citation: Power Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd (No. 3) [2011] FCA 539
Parties: POWER INFRASTRUCTURE PTY LIMITED (ACN 126 099 643) v DOWNER EDI ENGINEERING POWER PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 983 700); DOWNER EDI ENGINEERING POWER PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 983 700); POWER INFRASTRUCTURE PTY LIMITED (ACN 126 099 643) and JASON POWER
File number: NSD 692 of 2010
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleading – particulars – application for further and better particulars – sufficiency of particulars supplied – further requests unnecessary to enable other parties to know the case they had to meet –overarching purpose – duties of the parties
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N Federal Court Rules O 12 r 1, O 12 r 2, O 12 r 3, O 12 r 4, O 12 r 5
Cases cited: Deemah Marble & Granite Pty Ltd (in liq) v Sutherland [2001] NSWSC 829 Police & Nurses Credit Society Ltd v Burgess Rawson (WA) Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1395 Trade Practices Commission v Total Australia (1975) 24 FLR 413
Date of hearing: 6 May 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 66
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Cotman SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: CLS Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Williams
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate