Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lin v Rail Corporation New South Wales [2011] FCA 546 Citation: Lin v Rail Corporation New South Wales [2011] FCA 546
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Lin v Rail Corporation New South Wales [2011] FCA 261
Parties: HUAI NING LIN KNOWN AS SARAH LIN v RAIL CORPORATION NEW SOUTH WALES and FAIRFAX MEDIA PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD
File number: NSD 422 of 2011
Judge: BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 25 May 2011
Legislation: Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) ss 43, 68(2), 72(6) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A), 24(1D)(b), 31A(2) Federal Court Rules O 20 r 5, O 20 r 6, O 52 r 10, O 52 r 15(2) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) ss 14(1), 63, 73 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51AB, 82(2) Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 17
Cases cited: Deighton v Telstra Corporation Limited [1997] FCA 1568 Lin v Rail Corporation New South Wales [2011] FCA 261 Gleeson v Secretary, Department of Family, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2011] FCA 437 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 Parker v The Queen [2002] FCAFC 133 Re Luck (2003) 78 ALJR 177 Sharman License Holdings Ltd v Universal Music Aust Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 802 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate