Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alfred v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2011] FCA 557 Citation: Alfred v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2011] FCA 557
Parties: GREGORY ALFRED v CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
File number: VID 390 of 2010
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 2 June 2011
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – contempt of orders - considerations to be taken into account when fixing penalty
Legislation: Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31 High Court Rules 2004 (Cth) Rule 11.04.1 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 24
Cases cited: Alfred v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2011] FCA 556 Bovis Lend Lease Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2009] FCA 650 cited, applied BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2001] FCA 336 cited Concrete Constructions Pty Ltd v Plumbers and Gasfitters Employees' Union (No 2) (1987) 15 FCR 64 cited Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd (2003) 196 ALR 350 discussed, applied Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd (2006) 149 FCR 494 cited Williams v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2010] FCA 754 referred to Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate