Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 562 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 562
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v CEMENT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 104 053 474, CEMENT AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 001 085 561, CEMENT AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND) PTY LTD FORMERLY QUEENSLAND CEMENT LTD ACN 009 658 520, POZZOLANIC ENTERPRISES PTY LTD ACN 010 367 898, POZZOLANIC INDUSTRIES PTY LTD ACN 010 608 947, CHRISTOPHER GUY LEON and CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN WHITE
File number(s): QUD 295 of 2008
Judge: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 26 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an application to admit into evidence representations contained in a document said to fall within the notion of a business record for the purposes of s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – consideration of s 135 and s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 69, 135 and 136
Cases cited: Rural Press Ltd v ACCC (2002) 118 FCR 236 - cited Rural Press Ltd v ACCC (2003) 216 CLR 53 - cited Timms v Commonwealth Bank [2003] NSWSC 576 – cited ASIC v Rich (2005) 216 ALR 320 – cited NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power & Water Authority [1999] FCA 1549 - cited Lym International Pty Limited v Chen; Marcolongo v Lym International Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1156 - cited
Date of hearing: 18 May 2011
Date of last submissions: 18 May 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate