Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 582 Citation: King v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 582
Parties: GEORGE KING ON BEHALF OF THE NGAPURRPINKAKUJARRA GROUP, THE YINGAWUNARRI GROUP, THE PURRURRUKA GROUP v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA, A A COMPANY PTY LTD (ACN 010 317 067) and TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ABN 33 051 775 556)
File number: NTD 13 of 2010
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 2 June 2011
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – Consent Determination – requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – agreement of parties – prescribed body corporate
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Native Title Amendment Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: King v Northern Territory (2007) 162 FCR 89 cited Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 considered Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 cited Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 cited Smith v State of Western Australia (2000) 104 FCR 494 cited
Date of hearing: 2 June 2011
Place: Pigeon Hole
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: R Gosford
Solicitor for the Applicant: Northern Land Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate