Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GM Holden Ltd v Paine (No 2) [2011] FCA 587 Citation: GM Holden Ltd v Paine (No 2) [2011] FCA 587
Parties: GM HOLDEN LTD (ACN 006 893 232), GENERAL MOTORS LLC and GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC v BELAAA PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (FORMERLY TALEB TYRES (AUST) PTY LIMITED) (ACN 107 451 794), AHMED TALEB and MOHAMED TALEB
File number: VID 629 of 2010
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 1 June 2011
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52, 53(a)
Cases cited: GM Holden Ltd v Paine [2011] FCA 569
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Receipt of last written submissions: 27 May 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicants: E Heerey
Solicitor for the Applicants: Middletons
Counsel for the Respondents: A Franklin SC with J S Mendel
Solicitor for the Respondents: Theodore Solomon & Partners
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 629 of 2010
BETWEEN: GM HOLDEN LTD (ACN 006 893 232)
First Applicant
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Second Applicant
GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Third Applicant
AND: BELAAA PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (FORMERLY TALEB TYRES (AUST) PTY LIMITED) (ACN 107 451 794)
Eighth Respondent
AHMED TALEB
Ninth Respondent
MOHAMED TALEB
Tenth Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 30 May 2011 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate