Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shirreff v Beck Legal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 604 Citation: Shirreff v Beck Legal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 604
Appeal from: Shirreff v Beck Legal Pty Ltd [2010] FMCA 697
Parties: AUSTIN DOUGLAS SHIRREFF v BECK LEGAL PTY LTD
File number: VID 845 of 2010
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 26 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders under s 25(2B) of the Federal Court Act 1976 – whether a failure to prosecute appeal with due diligence as required by O 52 r 38 of the Federal Court Rules – frequent and persistent failure to comply with orders of the Court – failure to file an appeal book in the form required by O 52 r 26 of the Federal Court Rules – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 52 r 38, O 52 r 26, Federal Court of Australia Act 1976) Cth ss 25(2B)(ba) (bb), 37M
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Dowling v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 28 Mijac Investments Pty Ltd v Graham [2010] FCA 87 Shirreff v Beck Legal Pty Ltd [2010] FMCA 697 Shirreff v Beck Legal Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1407 Shirreff v Beck Legal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 603 Van Reesema v Giameos (1979) 27 ALR 525
Date of hearing: 26 May 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate